🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a rising chorus of states are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". The policy may be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban is "one of the measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a proposal lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a advisory motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is given. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the move does not enact binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid first step," said a leading parliamentarian driving the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "supported by strong data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have raised concerns. An organization set up by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing disturbing social media material suggests that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and fit for minors," said a prominent peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law restricting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some individuals to copy Australia's path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Beyond the West, additional nations are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies adopt a more measured position. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this global conversation evolves, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are no longer content to delay for platforms to self-regulate.